Meeting EAT–Lancet dietary guidelines would reduce the global water footprint but increase it for 40% of the world’s population

  • 1.

    Willett, W. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems. Lancet 393447–492 (2019).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Healthy and sustainable diets: guiding principles (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2019).

  • 3.

    Hirvonen, K., Bai, Y., Headey, D. & Masters, WA Affordability of EAT–Lancet reference diet: a global analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 8e59–e66 (2020).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 4.

    Ringman, M. et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562519-525 (2018).

    ADS
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing environmental impacts of food by producers and consumers. Science 360987–992 (2018).

    ADS
    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 6.

    Vanham, D., Mekonnen, MM & Hoekstra, AY Tree nuts and peanuts in the EAT–Lancet reference diet: concerns about sustainable water use. Global. Dry. Food 24100357 (2020).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • seven.

    Semba, RD et al. Adopting the “planetary health regime” has different impacts on countries’ greenhouse gas emissions. Nat. Food 1481–484 (2020).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Springmann, M. et al. The safety and sustainability of national and global food-based dietary guidelines: a modeling study. BMJ 370m2322 (2020).

  • 9.

    Find your way to eat greener, not too much and be active! (Swedish National Food Agency, 2015).

  • ten.

    Tuomisto, HL The complexity of sustainable diets. Nat. School. Evol. 3720–721 (2019).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 11.

    Mekonnen, M. & Hoekstra, A. The green, blue and gray water footprint of crops and derived plant products. Hydrol. System Ground Sci. To discuss. 8763–809 (2011).

  • 12.

    Tuninetti, M., Tamea, S., D’Odorico, P., Laio, F. & Ridolfi, L. Global sensitivity of high-resolution crop water footprint estimates. Water resource. Res. 518257–8272 (2015).

    ADS
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Tamea, S., Tuninetti, M., Soligno, I. & Laio, F. Virtual water trade and the water footprint of agricultural products: the CWASI database 1961–2016. System Ground Sci. Data 132025-2051 (2021).

    ADS
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 14.

    D’Odorico, P. et al. The global nexus between food, energy and water. Rev. Geophys. 56456–531 (2018).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 15.

    D’Odorico, P. et al. Global Virtual Water Trade and the Hydrological Cycle: Patterns, Drivers and Socio-Environmental Impacts. Approx. Res. Lett. 14053001 (2019).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 16.

    FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations); http://faostat.fao.org

  • 17.

    Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., Van Otterdijk, R. & Meybeck, A. Food loss and food waste around the world: magnitude, causes and prevention (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011).

  • 18.

    Kummu, M. et al. Food lost, resources wasted: losses in the global food supply chain and their impacts on the use of fresh water, cropland and fertilizers. Sci. About. 438477–489 (2012).

    ADS
    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 (GBD 2015)Demographic Index (IDS) 19802015 (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2015); http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ihme-data/gbd-2015-socio-demographic-index-sdi-1980%E2%80%932015

  • 20.

    Afshin, A. et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic review for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 3931958-1972 (2019).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 21.

    Bennett, MK International contrasts in food consumption. geogr. Tower. 31365–376 (1941).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 22.

    Aune, D., Ursin, G. & Veierød, M. Meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Diabetology 522277-2287 (2009).

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 23.

    Micha, R., Michas, G. & Mozaffarian, D. Unprocessed red and processed meats and the risk of coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes – an updated review of the evidence. Running. Atheroscler. representing 14515–524 (2012).

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Bene, C. et al. Five priorities for operationalizing the EAT–Lancet Committee report. Nat. Food 1457–459 (2020).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 25.

    Vermeulen, SJ, Park, T., Khoury, CK & Béné, C. Changing diets and transforming the global food system. Anna. NY Acad. Sci. 14783–17 (2020).

    ADS
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 26.

    Miller, V. et al. Availability, affordability and consumption of fruits and vegetables in 18 countries by income level: results of the prospective study on urban rural epidemiology (pure). Lancet Glob. Health 4e695–e703 (2016).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 27.

    Costello, C. et al. The future of sea food. Nature 58895-100 (2020).

    ADS
    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Allan, JA Virtual water—the link between water, food and trade. Useful concept or misleading metaphor? Int. water 28106–113 (2003).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 29.

    Tuninetti, M., Ridolfi, L. & Laio, F. Ever-increasing productivity of agricultural land and water: a global multi-crop analysis. About. Res. Lett. 150940a2 (2020).

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Roache, SA & Gostin, LO The Untapped Power of Soft Drink Taxes: Incentivizing Consumers, Generating Revenues, and Changing Business Behaviour. Int. J. Health policy management. 6489-493 (2017).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 31.

    Mason-D’Croz, D. et al. Gaps between production, demand and recommended consumption of fruits and vegetables at global and national levels: an integrated modeling study. Lancet Planet. Health 3e318–e329 (2019).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 32.

    Herforth, A. & Ahmed, S. The food environment, its effects on food consumption and the potential for measurement in agriculture-nutrition interventions. Dry. Food seven505–520 (2015).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 33.

    Downs, SM, Ahmed, S., Fanzo, J. & Herforth, A. Typology of the food environment: advancing an expanded definition, framework, and methodological approach for better characterization of wild, cultivated, and built food environments toward sustainable diets. food 9532 (2020).

  • 34.

    The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020 (FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO, 2020).

  • 35.

    Geyik, O., Hadjikakou, M., Karapinar, B. & Bryan, BA Global. Dry. Food 28100490 (2021).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 36.

    Taillie, LS, Reyes, M., Colchero, MA, Popkin, B. & Corvalán, C. An evaluation of Chilean law on food labeling and advertising of sugar-sweetened beverage purchases from 2015 to 2017: a study before after . PLoS Med. 17e1003015 (2020).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 37.

    Davis, KF et al. Alternative cereals can improve water use and nutrient supply in India. Sci. Adv. 4eaao1108 (2018).

    ADS
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 38.

    Nutrient factors (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2012); http://www.fao.org/economic/the-statistics-division-ess/publications-studies/publications/nutritive-factors/en/

  • 39.

    Human energy requirements: report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2004).

  • 40.

    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2019 https://population.un.org/wpp/DataQuery/ (2019).

  • 41.

    Tuninetti, M., Ridolfi, L. & Laio, F. Mapping future agricultural trade and its impact on water resources. Sci. Approx. 714136626 (2020).

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 42.

    Herrero, M. et al. Biomass use, production, feed efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of global livestock systems. proc. Natl Acad. Sci. United States 11020888–20893 (2013).

    ADS
    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 43.

    Aldaya, M., Chapagain, A., Hoekstra, A. & Mekonnen, M. The Water Footprint Handbook: Setting the Global Standard (Taylor and Francis, 2012).

  • 44.

    Tamea, S., Tuninetti, M., Soligno, I. & Laio, F. CWASI database: Virtual water trade and water footprint of consumption of agricultural products (1961-2016) (Zenodo, 2020); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3987468

  • 45.

    Kastner, T., Kastner, M. & Nonhebel, S. Tracing the remote environmental impacts of agricultural products from the consumer perspective. School. Econ. 701032-1040 (2011).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • Comments are closed.